International Business Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational En

Question: Examine about theInternational Businessfor Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Answer: Presentation Patricia being a new alumni from a business college could have planned something more for create or manufacture the worldwide relationship of Unlimited Combines with different organizations and increment their deal in the worldwide market. Leading an overview on the Japanese firm, before visiting the spot could have been a significant advance (Teece). This would have given Patricia more data about the organization and would have lead to a smooth business exchange. An exhaustive investigation of the Japanese condition could have been finished by Patricia to comprehend the necessities of the Japanese individuals and this would have in the long run helped her to actualize a superior business procedure. Legitimate arranging and the executives of every one of these variables would have caused Patricia to build the offer of the Unlimited Combines. While the Japanese firm was eager to have a drawn out installment relationship with Unlimited Combines, Patricia settled on paying cash ahead of time, which didn't end up being very favorable for the development of the organization. Patricia could have acknowledged the proposal of specialized preparing however she didn't hold fast to the recommendation so as to avoid the danger of any lawful issue. Patricia could likewise have given an arrangement to the Japanese firm to utilize her pamphlet and decipher that in different dialects however Patricia didn't give them the handout, which made a negative business connection between them. These little things Patricia could have done so as to build up her companys universal relationship and deal. Patricia could have methodicallly chalked out her excursion to Japan. Patricia could have masterminded and pre-arranged her excursion to keep away from the issues that she looked upon her appearance. She could have done an exploration on Japan and the spot she is visiting to dodge any bother (Verbeke). In any case, upon her appearance in Japan Patricia comprehended that language is an extraordinary issue and that no one talks in English. She could have taken a mediator with her for better business correspondence in Japan. Patricia could have done a point by point investigation of the Japanese culture and strict convictions to all the more likely comprehend their working approach. Tolerance is additionally a significant part of worldwide business and Patricia was very hurried in her choices. Patricia disapproved of the considerable number of recommendations or requests made by the Japanese firm. To make the excursion for work increasingly effective, Patricia could have taken a ranking director with her to help her in giving her some important business tips. Patricia confronted language issue in Japan, for which Patricia could have taken assistance from the Translators of Japan, however she didn't think that its important and along these lines, she in a way caused the Japanese firm or association to feel awkward. For making, the excursion a fruitful one, Patricia could likewise have taken a few presents or endowments simply like the Japanese association to start a warm business connection between the two associations. Patricia could have masterminded of a few gathering meetings with the Japanese firm to cause them to comprehend the advantages of the affiliation or coordinated effort between the two organizations and the benefit of such affiliation. Reference: Teece, David J. A powerful abilities based innovative hypothesis of the global enterprise.Journal of International Business Studies45.1 (2014): 8-37. Verbeke, Alain.International business methodology. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Free Essays on Same-sex Marriages

Wrong Future Step. Same-sex marriage is a major issue in the United States and in certain nations around the globe. These days, saying that somebody is a â€Å"gay or lesbian† resembles a recognizable joke among individuals. It is realized that in each nation around the globe there are â€Å"gay or lesbian† individuals. Hawaii is the main express that sanctions same-sex relationships, and numerous different states are thinking about authorizing it. This may happen in the US due to the high level of gays and lesbians. Same-sex relationships ought not be authorized in light of the fact that it speaks to gigantic change and harm to society and to the quintessence and significance of marriage. Legitimizing same-sex relationships will change totally the entire society. It will create sex turmoil to youngsters who won't know whether they are hetero or gay. The rates of gay individuals will increment if same-sex relationships is permitted. On the off chance that equivalent sex relationships is correct, youngsters from school will discover that is similarly worthy to wed an individual with the equivalent or distinctive sex. This infers it is totally right and perceived by the law that man can wed another man. Being instructed that equivalent sex relationships is lawful, understudies will openly decide for their accomplice a hetero or gay individual. Numerous families won't acknowledge that their youngster could be a gay individual and that he can wed another with a similar sex. Therefore, it will be a major war between the families who are for and against this point in light of the fact that the greater part of the families in the United States are against this position. On the off chance that an equivalent sex marriage is lawful, youngsters will befuddle what direction - being gay or hetero to take throughout everyday life. In this manner, being a gay might be a good example. Kids appropriation will be a major issue in same-sex couples who need to receive youngsters. The youngster received might be later on equivalent to his/her parent. It might be better for a kid to be raised by a hetero couple accordi... Free Essays on Same-sex Marriages Free Essays on Same-sex Marriages Wrong Future Step. Same-sex marriage is a major issue in the United States and in certain nations around the globe. These days, saying that somebody is a â€Å"gay or lesbian† resembles a natural joke among individuals. It is realized that in each nation around the globe there are â€Å"gay or lesbian† individuals. Hawaii is the main express that authorizes same-sex relationships, and numerous different states are thinking about sanctioning it. This may happen in the US as a result of the high level of gays and lesbians. Same-sex relationships ought not be sanctioned in light of the fact that it speaks to gigantic change and harm to society and to the pith and importance of marriage. Authorizing same-sex relationships will change totally the entire society. It will create sex turmoil to youngsters who won't know whether they are hetero or gay. The rates of gay individuals will increment if same-sex relationships is permitted. In the event that equivalent sex relationships is correct, youngsters from school will discover that is similarly worthy to wed an individual with the equivalent or diverse sex. This suggests it is totally right and perceived by the law that man can wed another man. Being trained that equivalent sex relationships is lawful, understudies will openly decide for their accomplice a hetero or gay individual. Numerous families won't acknowledge that their youngster could be a gay individual and that he can wed another with a similar sex. Hence, it will be a major war between the families who are for and against this point in light of the fact that a large portion of the families in the United States are against this position. In the event that an equivalent sex marriage is lawful, youngsters will befuddle what direction - being gay or hetero to take throughout everyday life. Consequently, being a gay might be a good example. Youngsters selection will be a major issue in same-sex couples who need to receive kids. The youngster embraced might be later on equivalent to his/her parent. It might be better for a kid to be raised by a hetero couple accordi...

Carter, Jimmy

Carter, Jimmy Carter, Jimmy (James Earl Carter, Jr.), 1924â€", 39th President of the United States (1977â€"81), b. Plains, Ga, grad. Annapolis, 1946. Carter served in the navy, where he worked with Admiral Hyman G. Rickover in developing the nuclear submarine program. Resigning his commission (1953) after his father's death, he ran his family's peanut farm, which he built into a prosperous business. In 1962 he was elected as a Democrat to the first of two terms in the Georgia Senate. He ran unsuccessfully for governor in 1966, then succeeded in 1970, replacing Lester Maddox . As governor (1971â€"75), Carter proclaimed that the time had come to end racial discrimination and formed alliances with such civil-rights leaders as Andrew Young . This focus on social justice, informed in part by his religious beliefs, remained a significant part of his subsequent political and postpolitical career. Although little known outside Georgia, Carter announced that he would run for president at the end of his gubernatorial term, and through sustained and diligent campaigning won the 1976 Democratic presidential nomination. With Minnesota Senator Walter F. Mondale as his running mate, Carter defeated incumbent President Gerald R. Ford . Carter substantially increased the responsibilities of the vice president during his administration, helping to establish modern vice presidency, which historically had been an often marginal office. But Carter never established good relations with Congress and, with Republican successes in the 1978 midterm elections, his difficulties increased. In foreign policy, Carter had some initial success. He secured congressional ratificationâ€"by a single vote after extended and rancorous debateâ€"of his two Panama Canal treaties (1977), establishing a timetable for passing control of the canal to Panama. Then, in 1979, at the presidential retreat at Camp David, Maryland, Carter personally persuaded Anwar al- Sadat of Egypt and Menachem Begin of Isra el to sign the first peace treaty between Israel and an Arab state (see Camp David accords ). Although he and Leonid Brezhnev signed the Salt II treaty (see disarmament, nuclear ), it had uncertain chances for Senate ratification, and Carter shelved the treaty in Jan., 1980, as a result of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (see Afghanistan War ). When the USSR refused to withdraw, Carter also initiated a trade embargo and a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympic Games. In the last year of his administration, Carter's foreign policy was overshadowed by the Iran hostage crisis , in which Iranian students invaded the U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 55 hostages. When attempts to negotiate their release failed, Carter authorized a military rescue mission in Apr., 1980, that failed ignominiously. Domestically, Carter had difficulties controlling inflation, which rose in each year of his administrationâ€"in part because of oil price increases after the Iranian revolution. The Federal Reserve Board's drastic remedies for curtailing inflation, undertaken under the leadership of Paul Volcker , who was appointed by Carter, led to interest rates of more than 20% by 1980. During Carter's tenure the cabinet departments of Education and Energy were established, and a general policy of government deregulation in energy and interstate transportation was pursued. Inflation and the unresolved hostage crisis put Carter in a weak position as the 1980 presidential election campaign began. He won the Democratic nomination only after a bitter challenge from Sen. Edward Kennedy . In the general election he was decisively defeated by Ronald Reagan . Since leaving office, Carter has been active in international human-rights efforts, often as an observer of first-time free elections. He has served as an international mediator in North Korea, Haiti, Bosnia, Venezuela, and elsewhere, and has worked to focus world attention on epidemics in Africa, focusing special attentio n on eradicating guinea worm disease and river blindness. He made a highly publicized trip to Cuba in May, 2002, becoming the most prominent American to visit the nation since Castro came to power. The Carter Center in Atlanta, founded in 1986, became an important arena for the discussion of international affairs. Carter also has been deeply involved with Habitat for Humanity, a nonprofit organization that helps working-class people in North America and abroad build and finance new homes. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his efforts to advance peace, democracy, human rights, and economic and social development. Jimmy Carter married Rosalynn Smith in 1946; they have four children. During his term of office Carter published Why Not the Best? (1975) and A Government as Good as Its People (1977). After it, he wrote more than 25 works of poetry and nonfiction, including The Blood of Abraham (1985); Everything to Gain (1987, written with his wife Rosalynn); Turn ing Point (1992); The Hornet's Nest (2003), a novel set in the South during the Revolutionary War; Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid (2006), which some criticized as one-sided and anti-Israeli; and A Call to Action (2014), a plea for women's rights. See his memoirs, Keeping Faith (1982) and An Hour before Daylight (2001) and his White House Diary (2010); biographies by J. E. Zelizer (2010) and R. Ballmer (2014); J. Wooten, Dasher: The Roots and the Rising of Jimmy Carter (1978); E. C. Hargrove, Jimmy Carter as President (1988); P. G. Bourne, Jimmy Carter (1997); D. Brinkley, The Unfinished Presidency (1998); B. Glad, An Outsider in the White House (2009); E. S. Godbold, Jr., Jimmy Rosalynn Carter: The Georgia Years, 1924â€"1974 (2010); J. B. Flippen, Jimmy Carter, the Politics of Family, and the Rise of the Religious Right (2011). The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. See more Encyclopedia articles on: U.S. History: Biographies

Preparing Your Family History Book for Publication

After years of carefully researching and assembling a family history, many genealogists find that they want to make their work available to others. Family history means a lot more when its shared. Whether you want to print a few copies for family members or sell your book to the public-at-large, todays technology makes self-publishing a fairly easy process. How Much Will It Cost? To estimate publishing costs, you will need to consult with local quick-copy centers or book printers. Obtain bids for the publishing job from at least three companies since prices vary greatly. Before you can ask a printer to bid on your project, however, you need to know three vital facts about your manuscript: Exactly how many pages are in your manuscript. You should take the finished manuscript with you, including mock-ups of picture pages, introductory pages, and appendixes.Approximately how many books you want to be printed. If you want to print under 200 copies, expect most book publishers to turn you down and send you to a quick-copy center. Most commercial printers prefer a run of at least 500 books. There are a few short-run and print-on-demand publishers who specialize in family histories, however, who are able to print in quantities as small as a single book.What kind of book features you want. Think about the paper type/quality, print size and style, number of photos, and binding. All of these will factor into the cost of printing your book. Spend some time browsing through family histories at the library to get some ideas on what you want before heading to the printers. Design Considerations LayoutThe layout should be appealing to the readers eye. For example, small print across the entire width of a page is too hard for the normal eye to read comfortably. Use a larger typeface and normal margin widths, or prepare your final text in two columns. You can align your text on both sides (justify) or only on the left side as in this book. The title page and table of contents are always on the right-hand page - never on the left. In most professional books, chapters also start on the right page. Printing Tip: Use high-quality 60 lb. acid-paper paper for copying or printing your family history book. Standard paper will discolor and become brittle within fifty years, and 20 lb. paper is too thin to print on both sides of the page. No matter how you space the text on the page, if you plan to do double-sided copying, be sure that the binding edge on each page is 1/4 inch wider than the outside edge. That means the left margin of the front of the page will be indented 1/4 extra, and the text on its flip side will have that extra indentation from the right margin. That way, when you hold the page up to the light, the blocks of text on both sides of the page match up with one another. PhotographsBe generous with photographs. People usually look at photographs in books before they read a word. Black-and-white pictures copy better than color ones and are a lot cheaper to copy as well. Photographs can be scattered throughout the text, or put in a picture section in the middle or back of the book. If scattered, however, photos should be used to illustrate the narration, not detract from it. Too many photos scattered haphazardly through the text can distract your readers, causing them to lose interest in the narration. If youre creating a digital version of your manuscript, be sure to scan the pictures at least at 300 dpi. Balance your selection of pictures to give equitable coverage to each family. Also, be sure you include short but adequate captions that identify each picture - people, place, and approximate date. If you don’t have the software, skills, or interest in doing it yourself, printers can scan your photos into digital format, and enlarge, reduce, and crop them to fit your layout. If you have a lot of pictures, this will add quite a bit to the cost of your book. Binding Options Printing or Publishing the Book Some publishers will print hard-bound family histories with no minimum order, but this usually increases the price per book. The advantage to this option is that family members can order their own copies when they wish, and you arent faced with purchasing books and storing them yourself.

The 19 Best Books on the Napoleonic Wars

Marriage amendment in the USA Free Essays

string(130) " marriage is the fact that the commitment of a marriage means the couples are discouraged from having sex with multiple partners\." Marriage has come a long way since it was first adopted in America. Marriage was first used for property protection, financial and political gain. Now however, people are more about being in love and devoted to a significant other. We will write a custom essay sample on Marriage amendment in the USA or any similar topic only for you Order Now In past American history, with our laws; it had been illegal for a same sex marriage. Gay marriages should be legalized in the United States, because everyone deserves happiness. There have been many attempts for people to get a marriage license, but have been denied because they were gay. Loving v. Virginia was case when the Supreme Court’s decision was declared as â€Å"The freedom to marry as long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.† Gays looked as this as a promise to be able to enjoy their personal rights (Lahey 16). The Loving decision gave hope to the gay community in guarantees to equality. Two early attempt cases that really started off the same-sex marriage were the trials of Baker v. Nelson and Singer v. Hara (Cabaj 131). The argument in the Baker case was based on constitutional guarantees of due process and Singer was based on equal process. Due process was the state’s denial of a marriage license by diminishing the freedom of a person to marry whom they want with the limits of basic material requirements (Cabaj 132). When the Baker case was taken to the Superior Court it was expected that the judge would dismiss the case, but the argument was made that by the definition of marriage was that it was a heterosexual union (Moats 116). Both cases used equal process because people were being denied marriage, when under the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection was stated. In the end of both cases neither were accessed marriage license. Hawaii Supreme Court stated that the denial of same-sex marriage would be presumed constitutional unless that state could prove that it could lead to state interest and order. What is the real harm in same-sex marriage? Everyone should have the chance to marry anyone they are in love with, and want a future to share. Homosexuals are out for the same thing heterosexuals are looking for in a marriage; personal intimacy, close relationships and social acceptance Vermont had allowed civil unions (which was just like a marriage license), and people from all over the United States filled for the application. The civil unions were made in 2000, but by 2003, 3,579 civil unions were accounted for, and only 625 came from Vermont. The civil unions have become a legal issue in the other states, because couples wanted to separate, but Vermont only allowed their residents to dissolve the civil union. Judges in other states did not approve of the dismissal of the civil unions, since they were not in favor of the idea in the beginning (Moats 245). Some gays did not like the idea of civil unions, because they wanted a marriage like any other person was granted. They saw the civil unions as a way to make the gays not protest as mush as they did, and keep quiet. Many of the people that did pass the civil union act were threaten by the people who opposed the idea. In Vermont there has been no proven evidence that society or the values of the people have been harmed (Moats 264). People do not pick their sexual orientation, and they are born the way everyone else is with the same rights and privileges any other American receives. Gays are discriminated all of the time, and nothing is being done about it. African Americans were first brought to the United States as slaves, but they have come a long way since then. They have the same rights as any white person living in the country. Homosexuals come in all types of color and should not be treated as a second class citizen. Legalizing marriage would only make marriage better off because then people are not forced to marry someone they have little attraction for, and sometimes bring innocent children into a stressful position. Having gay marriages would decrease the divorce rate, because then people would be happier with themselves and who they choose to love. How is it far to them they are not attracted to the opposite sex, and are treated different for that? Who says it is wrong for someone to love another person of the same sex? You can not fight who you are in love with, it is a feeling everyone should be able to find in another person. Isn’t happiness a key ingredient for a healthy marriage? There are many obvious benefits to a homosexual in a same-sex marriage. One benefit is gays would receive full legal equality (Rauch 55). They would receive the same rights as a man and woman marrying. Homosexuals would have the ability to put in law the love and compassion they share for each other. Gay people want to be able to spend the rest of their live wit that one special person and the legalization of gay marriages would allow for that to happen. They want the simple things in life such as living together, caring for another when they are sick and eating dinner every night with that other person. A new level of social acceptance to the gay community is a benefit to the marriage. The couple from a gay marriage benefit like any straight couple: having someone there for you when you need them. No one wants to go through life lonely. When a homosexual asks for marriage they are looking for a different and better kind of life, but really a better kind of love. Gay couples are not in a relationship for just sex, but more for love and affection. Many heterosexuals think that a homosexual’s relationship is based on sex. A benefit to heterosexual society of gay marriage is the fact that the commitment of a marriage means the couples are discouraged from having sex with multiple partners. You read "Marriage amendment in the USA" in category "Essay examples" This has the advantage of slowing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases (Rauch 72). Heterosexuals benefit from gay marriages because gay couples can not have babies of their own they will adopt, or have custody of a child from a previous marriage (Rauch 74). Legalizing same-sex marriage will only strengthen the meaning of marriage, and banning same-sex marriage will weaken marriage. Marriage is for everyone and each one is unique. The Constitution states that everyone is born with equal rights. So why can’t homosexuals share the same rights as heterosexuals in the experience of marriage? People of any sexual orientation should be able to choose who they want to be with. The Government may not approve of same-sex marriage but they should no deny it. Gays are also American citizens with all the same rights. The Fourteenth Amendment states that the law can not deny any persons of equal protection (Sullivan 107). Again, why are the courts denying marriage between same-sex couples? The government does not allow gay couples to file their taxes as a joint, and must file as single taxpayers (Burda 47). Same-sex couples do not benefit from the federal guarantee of payments to a surviving spouse, former spouse, unmarried children, or children that are disabled before age two (Burda 98). They also do not receive joined benefits under Medicare. Government benefits are not able to gay couples, but able to heterosexual couples. There are many arguments against same- sex marriages. Some people believe that marriage should be shared between just a man and women. Others believe that a gay couple can not raise a child normally. Gays are very capable of raising a child just like anyone else. Child molesters are allowed to marry, and bring children into the world, so why can’t a gay couple raise a child when the only thing they will do for the child is show love and commitment. People say that gay relationships are immoral, but to who? The Bible says it is immoral. The freedom we have we can choose what religion we want, and in some religions same-sex relations are celebrated, and not sinned. Another reason why people say same-sex marriage should not be legal is because they can not produce offspring, and continue a generation, but gays do not need to worry about that because there are many babies in the world looking for a good home to go to. Now, in reality the real reasons for why same-sex marriages are not legal: uncomfortable, offends religion, unnatural, betray, repulsive, and recruitment. Some people are just uncomfortable with same-sex couples, usually called a homophobic. Gays are normal people and should be treated like that. America has religious freedom and everyone has their own views on different situations and not all religions are at a disagreement with gay couples. Some people think that it is unnatural for the gay couples to act the way they do. Men believe that when gay men act feminine it betrays their masculine traits they should have. Straight people think it is repulsive to see affection of gay couples, but gay couples also think it is repulsive to see straight couples’s affection. For some reason some people think that gay people go out and look for straight people to make them gay. Someone can not make another person gay; sexual orientation is inborn and can not be changed. Having a fear of being ‘recruited’ is just silly to even think about. Homosexuals should be treated better and not stereotype as second-class citizens. Many homosexuals decide to have a family together, and many adopt since they can not produce with each other. There are many children that are put up for adoption and/or put in foster homes, and now there is a shortage of places to put these children. Now, a lot of gay couples adopt these children to give them a healthy and happy life. There have been proven test showing that same-sex couples turn out to be great parents. Giving a child a loving and nurturing home is how a child should be treated, and gay couples have the ability to treat the child like any other parent would (Drucker 42). There is no evidence that children living in a gay home are less intelligent, suffer problems, less popular, or having a low self-esteem. The children of the homosexual families grow up happy, healthy and well adjusted as if they would in a heterosexual family. If a same-sex adoptive couple separated there are three scenarios that can bee looked at; when both parents are legal parents, when one partner is the legal parent but the law grants some rights to the nonlegal parent, and when the law denies nonlegal parents all rights. When both parents have legal custody over the child they are treated as if they were married because then they handle custody and visitation rights and need to work out through the parents. In the other cases the court says how the child will live with the parents. Many gay parents feel that their children and their parenting will be harder than it really is because of their sexual orientation. Many of the parents are feared about what their neighbors will think of their actions about having a different lifestyle than the social norm. Same-sex parents need to raise their child with gender awareness to live a open minded lifestyle (Brill 107). A number of leading health and child welfare organizations, however, have found that same-sex couples should be able to adopt and raise children. They include the Child Welfare League of America, North American Council on Adoptable Children, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Association of Social Workers (Drucker 117). A child being raised by same-sex parents does not cause the child to be homosexual. The parents are aware that there will be many expressions of sexuality, but they are usually more concerned with the personality and personal goodness of a potential mate that they are with their partner’s gender (Drucker 198). Girls that are tomboys and boys that play with dolls don’t necessarily grow up to be gay or a lesbian. For the most part homosexuality is more of an issue for out of the family then the members of the family. Gays and Lesbians have the same equal rights as anyone else in America. We have been born in the United States and instantly granted natural rights. Gay or straight everyone should have the same opportunities and not be denied something they dream for. Allowing same-sex marriage will decrease heterosexual divorces and increase the love people feel for each other because they can be with someone they truly want to be with. The United States holds its head up high when it comes to our constitution and what it stands for, but in reality not everyone is treated equal. It is not right for people to be denied something that they are and not have the same rights as any other person because they did not live like the social norms. America varies in everything from race, religion, and sexual orientation, and everyone needs to be treated as if they were not second class citizens. The pursuit of happiness is in our constitution and for gays and lesbians they should be granted their happiness also, for they are also citizens of this country and need to be treated like they are. References Brill, Stephanie. â€Å"The Queer Parent’s Primer† USA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. 2001. Burda, Joan M. â€Å"Estate Planning for Same-Sex Couples.† USA: ABA General Practice, Solo Small Firm Section. 2004. Burns, Kate. â€Å"Gay and Lesbian Families† New York: Greenhavens Press. 2005. Cabaj, Robert P. â€Å"On the Road to Same-Sex Marriages.† USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. 1997. Drucker, Jane. â€Å"Families of Value† New York: Plenum Press. 1998. Lahey, Kathleen. â€Å"Same Sex Marriage† Canada: Insomniac Press. 2004 Moats, David. â€Å"Civil Wars, a Battle for Gay Marriage.† New York: Harcourt, Inc. 2004. Rauch, Jonathan. â€Å"Gay Marriage† New York: Times Books Henry Holt and Company: 2004. Sullivan, Andrew. â€Å"Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con† USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: 1997. How to cite Marriage amendment in the USA, Essay examples

Lord Of The Flies Essays (752 words) - English-language Films

Lord Of The Flies In most books, the authors use symbolism to expand the novel beyond its literal meaning. Symbolism is used to represent or foreshadow the theme of the story. As one reads William Golding's classic novel, Lord of the Flies, he will begin to recognize the way basic civilization is slowly stripped away from the boys. In this novel, the author utilizes many elements of symbolism to help accomplish his message, which is man is basically evil. In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses signal fire not only to rescue the characters from corruption and evil, but also to symbolize common sense. The boys, who are stranded on an island, create fire, attempting to contact boats out on the sea. They use the fire to signal to the boats that are out on the ocean for assistance. In the beginning, the boys are eager to leave the uninhabited island, so they try their best to make the signal fire. Also, the author reveals that the boys desire to depart from the island because they are afraid that they will turn into savages; the boys fear that savagery will cause them to kill other innocent people. Life became a race with the fire and the boys scattered through the upper forest. To keep clean flag of flame flying on the mountain was the immediate end and no one looked further. Even the smallest boys, unless fruit claimed them, brought little pieces of wood and threw them in. (129) As time progresses, savagery becomes more evident in the boys' behavior. When Jack steals Piggy's specs, the only hope of lighting the fire is destroyed: the specs are the only way to start the fire. Thus, the boys cannot be rescued from the island. We [cannot] keep one fire going. And they dont care. And what is more, I dont sometimes. (139) With the loss of the fire, common sense is also lost and savagery prevails. In attempting to rescue themselves from savagery, the boys also face a dilemma of saving themselves from the beast. Because they have heard dreadful stories about the beast, the boys are intimidated by it. However, they do not realize that the beast is the evil that resides within themselves. The boys are, all aware that such a beast exists, but none of them realize, except Simon, that it lies within them. The beast also symbolizes savagery. A beast represents a wild, cruel animal, and humans are also beasts since they have an innate animal instinct within themselves. In the story, the author mentions how the beast is a hunter and [people cannot] kill it. (126) The beast apparently cannot be eradicated because it is the id part of human beings. Also because Simon represents the conscience of human beings, he reminds the boys that the [beast is] only us, (89) The conch, being a symbol of high hand and authority, is used to call meetings and to set laws throughout the island. People need civilization. They require laws and rules within their lives; the restrictions bring structure and order to an otherwise chaotic lifestyle. Without laws, civilization ceases to exist because then, humans return to a primitive state of savagery. The conch is the only connection that the boys have with the real world of rules. Otherwise, they would be running around uncontrolled. However, the conch ensures that there is some sort of moderation in the boys' lives. The island is savage wilderness where civilization is nowhere to be seen. Thus, the boys require some sort of reminder, a check that will keep them at bay. But when the destruction of the conch is made the authority on the island is gone and Ralph is left to fend for himself. In Lord of the Flies, Golding utilizes many elements of symbolism to attain his message, which is man is basically evil. This is recognized by first showing how the signal fires represents the rescue from corruption and how the signal fire is slowly extinguished. Furthermore, the beast represents the beast within the children. The beast that will bring out the savagery in the children. Finally, the conch is symbolizes the way civilization is the law and rule that will